Home
A global shift toward decolonising the abantu mind
There is an increased shift towards decolonization and Indigenous people are starting to seek for the truth that they had been forced to forget. And they claim the land, and the matriarch is rising to make amends for the injustice.
The colonial project in South Africa is rooted in a 15th-century legal and religious framework known as the Doctrine of Discovery, which justified the seizure of land and the subjugation of Indigenous peoples by European Christian nations. This doctrine established a, “framework of dominance” that declared lands not inhabited by Christians as “empty” (terra nullius) or “discoverable,” dehumanizing indigenous populations as “savages” or “inferior”. In South Africa, this ideology directly informed centuries of dispossession, forced removals, and a “coloniality” in education designed to alienate African youth from their culture and prepare them for subservience.
Some of the things we are to be aware of are how the injustice was imposed.
The Doctrine of Discovery
The Land as an Estate: The vast territories of the “Copper colored/Bantu/Black people” were legally re-framed as a massive Estate or Trust.
The Government as Executor: The newly formed Nation-States appointed themselves as the Executor or Trustee of this massive estate.
From Owners to Beneficiaries/Debtors: The indigenous people, who were once the sovereign owners, were legally demoted to the status of beneficiaries or “wards” of the state. In this new trust relationship, the government (the Creditor) managed the resources, and the native people were placed in the position of dependents or Debtors, reliant on the executor for their own property. This is the foundation of the reservation system.
“The Doctrine of Discovery was the original software, so to speak, used to legally justify the takeover of the Americas. When it came to Africa, the same core dogma was at play: European, Christian nations believed they had a superior right to the land and resources of non-European, non-Christian peoples.”
For centuries, this was primarily enforced through Maritime Law. European powers set up coastal forts and trading posts. They engaged in slave trade from the sea, interacting with the African nations largely through contracts and trade agreements and claimed and control the entire continent.
Africa as a Massive Trust
After the map was drawn, the same Trust model that was applied to the “copper colored people” was implemented across Africa.
The Estate: The entire continent and its immense natural wealth were treated as the assets of a massive Trust.
The Executors and Creditors: The European colonial powers were the Executors, managing the estate for their own benefit. They became the Creditors, extracting wealth (rubber, diamonds, gold, labor) to enrich themselves.
The People as Debtors: The African people were turned into subjects in their own land. Through taxes (like hut taxes or poll taxes), they were forced into the cash economy, often having to work for colonial enterprises just to pay the taxes. This effectively made them Debtors within the new colonial corporate system. They were now legally obligated to serve the trust.
The process that took centuries in the Americas was systematically and rapidly applied to Africa. The Berlin Conference wasn’t the cause of the division, but it was the formal, legalistic event where the colonizers agreed on the rules of the game. It was the moment they put their plan for turning an entire continent into a series of trusts, run for their own profit, down on paper under the color of law. It was the perfection of the colonial playbook.
Recent posts from our blog
- Unpacking the original groups that became Zulu, Sotho and Xhosa and other groups
- The wars and outbreaks from the 1800s in Southern (South Akabolane)
- Ethnic groups of the Southern (South Akabolane)
- The Cosmic Order of Kemet Deities. Duality, Balance, and Immortality
- From an internal “Christ consciousness” to the external, “lord and savior” Jesus.
- Freemasonry playing a surprisingly central role in the colonial project
- What is a Republic?
- Unam Sanctam: One Authority Over All? What It Means for Us Today
- Muntu, how do history and law go together?
- Aligning with the Celestial Rhythm of the moon
- The 12 Houses of Life — Your Cosmic Map
- Planetary Movements & Transits Made Simple
- Libra to Pisces — The Path Beyond the Self
Hidden Truths and Roots in the Doctrine of Discovery
- Papal Bulls as Legal Justification: The roots lie in 15th-century decrees like Romanus Pontifex (1455), which authorized Portugal to enslave non-Christians and seize their lands, and Inter Caetera (1493). These decreed that European explorers could claim territory simply by “discovering” it and planting a flag.
- The “Terra Nullius” Lie: Despite South Africa being inhabited for millennia, colonial powers acted as if the land was empty or owned by no one, delegitimizing indigenous systems of ownership and governance.
- Dehumanization as Policy: The Doctrine relied on a “delusion of a superior white skin and culture” to justify the looting of resources and the classification of indigenous people as inferior.
- Globalized Racism: The Doctrine was not just European; it was incorporated into international law and used to underpin systemic racism and land dispossessions that continue to affect contemporary land policies in South Africa.
Educating the Native: in South Africa
Colonial education was never intended to empower, but to serve the needs of a capitalist, white-dominated state.
- Missionary Education & Assimilation: Early missionary schools in the 1800s focused on Christianizing and Europeanizing indigenous populations, subtly alienating children from their home cultures.
- Bantu Education Act (1953): This apartheid-era law designed a specifically inferior education for black South Africans. It was engineered to ensure “the native must be taught to realize his place in society”—specifically as a source of cheap, unskilled labor.
- Language as a Tool of Control: The imposition of European languages (English/Afrikaans) served to marginalize African languages and culture, creating a feeling of “foreignness” in their own land.
- Inferiority Complex: The curriculum created a sense of cultural disassociation, making learners feel their heritage was inferior, which was nurtured well into adulthood.
- Cultural Disassociation & Identity Crisis: Many black South Africans still grapple with a, “coloniality” in the education system that privileges Western ideals, often leading to a loss of indigenous knowledge and identity.
- Economic Disempowerment: The focus on manual training rather than academic skill in the past has left lasting economic disparities.
- Spatial Apartheid: The initial land dispossession authorized by the Doctrine of Discovery directly contributes to ongoing, heated contestations over land ownership, mining rights, and spatial apartheid in modern South Africa.
- Psychological Trauma: The systemic, generation-long dehumanization has resulted in intergenerational trauma, manifesting in social instability and high levels of inequality.
- Ongoing Struggle for Decolonization: The calls for a “decolonised education” in South Africa are a direct response to these historical events, aiming to remove the lingering, “foreign” knowledge systems and affirm African identity and culture.
“Despite the end of apartheid in 1994, the, “coloniality” of the system often persists in policies, curriculum, and the, “hidden trauma” of having to navigate a, “white-standard” world.